Showing posts with label photo retouching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photo retouching. Show all posts

Friday, May 26, 2017

LOOK BACK OVER KELBURN NORMAL SCHOOL’S FIRST 100 YEARS!

I am pleased to annouce that Kelburn Normal School's Centennial history book is now available. Jo from Carterworks was responsible for image digitisation, restoration and retouching.


LOOK BACK OVER KELBURN NORMAL SCHOOL’S FIRST 100 YEARS!
Kelburn Normal School - Celebrating 100 Years is a brand new 150+ page, fully bound, hard-cover photographic book charting the school’s first 100 years (1914-2014).
Using previously published historical information, newly sourced personal memories from some of the thousands of pupils who have passed through its doors, and hundreds of photographs from the school and national archives, it’s a fascinating look back at Kelburn Normal School.   
The book is chock-full of images of the school and its pupils from the past 100 years. Is your child, parent or great/grandparent within its pages? Many have already found theirs!
Priced at $70, the Kelburn Centenary Committee is selling the book at cost, with no profit for the school. Postage ($7.50 in New Zealand) is additional, or books can be picked up from the school’s office for free.
28th June: A new shipment of books has just arrived so if you have not already ordered now is a good time to place an order at https://www.kns100book.co.nz/
We hope you enjoy looking back over the first 100 years of Kelburn Normal School.





Friday, December 4, 2015

More on photo editing before Photoshop

In a number of posts I have talked about photo editing in pre-photoshop times.  A recent article in PetaPixel talks about how editing was done - quoting an early photographer...


Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Photo manipulation before Photoshop at the Met

A couple of years ago I read a really interesting book called "Faking it: Manipulated photography before photoshop" by Mia Fineman which also was the basis for a Photography exhibition held at the Met. I was reminded about this when I saw a recent post in PetaPixel.com.

"Faking it" describes the art of photographic manipulation before Photoshop and shows that photographic manipulation started very early on in the development of Photography.  


 Faking It: Manipulated Photography Before Photoshop

Mia talks about seven different types of photo manipulation which are designed to:
1. correct faults in the original photograph and to compensate for the limitations of photography (the example in the article below from PetaPixel falls in this category)
2. create "art" photographs
3. persuade people - for political and ideological reasons
4. amuse and entertain - "novelty" photographs
5. represent images for print
6. create surreal dreamlike images and
7. deliberately change the photographic image (using modern manipulations and composites pre-Photoshop) - she calls - Protoshop....
Its a fascinating read and shows that photographic retouching and manipulation is not new - its a real skill the requires a eye for detail and understanding of proportion, composition and anatomy and patience to re-create reality, its just the tools have changed .....


For those of us who live down-under the Met has put the entire exhibition online at:       http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2012/faking-it 


Copyright Carterworks NZ

Monday, August 26, 2013

An example of an old retouched photo from the Image Permanence Institute

I have discovered a wonderful on line resource  that you can use to help you identify and conserve your photos.  It is called the Graphics Atlas which has been put together by the Image Permanence Institute a New York based research centre.

This online resource includes examples of all different types of early photos, slides and negatives.  Information about the construction of different types of photographs, negative and slides, the sort of damage they typically suffer from, cross sections and close up views of the image are provided. 

Below is an example of an early retouched photograph from the Atlas, proving that retouching and restoration is not a new, and in fact was used in early photographs.

 
 
Copyright Carterworks NZ

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Instagram and vintage - they're fun but they are not the only option for your old slides & vintage photos


Recently I have noticed lots of fashion shoots with a vintage or instagram look.  These are great fun. There are now tons of phone apps and photoshop tutorials that show you how to create these effects – which can look great  if chosen well and applied to the right image….
I started to wonder where the idea came from to add these effects...............

I suspect it is a result of home scanning of family photos....
Old colour photos and slides naturally produce this vintage or retro instagram effect because the scanning process just copies the chemical damage caused to the film or print over time.  While some images look nice, others just don’t work.  A lot of people just don’t know how to fix this …..and think their only option is to throw their photos away!

The good news is you have options.  You don’t have to put up with this chemical damage once your images are digitised.  Any digitised image can be colour corrected and restored to bring out the true colours of the original image . In this photo taken in the early 1980s, the original is on the left, the restored one is on the right….

 
You can also get rid of other unwanted effects - dust, scratches, over exposure, shadow, and even people as in this example from my website which was a Kodachrome slide from the 1960s.


 
If you have some images sitting round home that look like this…
then give me a call ........they can be saved
Alternatively you can send your scanned photos directly to me via my file up-loader!


Copyright Carterworks NZ

Monday, October 15, 2012

Portrait retouching and manipulation is nothing new


Photographic editing, retouching and restoration with Photoshop is something we associate with modern high end fashion photography and advertising in the late 20th century.  I was fascinated to read recently that photographic retouching is not a new process. As early as the 1850s as a matter of general practice photographers not only hid a subjects defects by skilful posing and lighting but also retouched or “beautified” photos removing blemishes and adding points of beauty because the camera represented the countenance too truthfully”.  Beautification involved the “manual interference with the negative or print and the photographer then leaves his proper domain of drawing with light and becomes that curious hybrid, the painter- photographer.” 

“… Indeed, the case with which anyone with a little skill could add to or take away from parts of the picture, presented a dangerous temptation to photographers to give way to the sitter’s desire for a flattering portrait, or to obtain ‘artistic’ effects. As the practice was so widespread many photographic societies refused to accept coloured photos or required the photographer to also show the original negative next to the print.  The Colourist, a photographic publication of the time instructed that the photographer

 ’may correct with his brush defects which, if allowed to remain, spoil any picture.  For instance, where a head is so irregular in form as to become unsightly, soften those features which are the most strikingly deformed, and reduce the head to greater semblance of beauty.  Try to discover what good points there are – for all heads have some good points – and give these their full value.  In his aspirations towards the Victorian ideal the photographer would try to make his sitter’s features conform to some such description as the following (with what result, may be left to the imagination):

(For women).  A handsome face is of an oval shape, both front view and in profile/  The nose slightly prominent in the centre, with small, well-rounded end, fine nostrils; small, full, projecting lips, the upper one short and curved upwards in the centre, the lower one slightly hanging down in the centre, both turned up a little at the corners, and receding inside; chin round and small; very small, low cheekbones, not perceptibly rising above the general rotundity.  Eyes large, inclined upward at the inner angles, downwards at outer angles; upper eyelids long, sloping beyond the white of the eye towards the temples.  Eyebrows arched, forehead round, smooth and small; hair rather profuse.  Of all things, do not draw the hair over the forehead if well formed, but rather up and away.  See the Venus de Medici, and for comparison see also Canova’s Venus, in which latter the hair is too broad.

(For men) An intellectual head has the forehead and chin projecting, the high facial angle presenting nearly a straight line; bottom lip projecting a little; eyebrows rather near together and low (raised eyebrows indicate weakness).  Broad forehead, overhanging eyelids, sometimes cutting across the iris to the pupil.

 As to the most important part of the woman’s figure, the waist, one instruction interpreted photography rather generously :’the retoucher may slice off, or curve the lady’s waist after his own idea of shape and form and size’.”

Extract from Helmut Gernsheim: The Rise of Photography 1850 – 1880.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Kelburn Normal School Photos scanned

Over the last few weeks I have been scanning a large number old photos from our local school in Kelburn, Wellington dating from the early 1900s through to the pre-digital present. The school will celebrate its centenary in 2014 and over the next wee while I will be restoring those in need of attention. As you can image some of the photos need some restorative work.  I will feature some of the before and after restorations on this site